KUH - a method to reduce the duration of pandemic efforts

"Any single person as an active contagian-preventer, but only for a short time"

The problem to solve:

"No legal measure has any influence on the "indifferent" high number of infections in the private sphere."

The only method to solve the problem may be right there:

 

(c)2022 Investment-Pool, all rights reserved.

(c)2022 Investment-Pool, all rights reserved.

(c)2022 Investment-Pool, all rights reserved.

(c)2022 Investment-Pool, all rights reserved.

(c)2022 Investment-Pool, all rights reserved.

(c)2022 Investment-Pool, all rights reserved.

(c)2022 Investment-Pool, all rights reserved.

 

FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

 

1. How can you briefly describe the concept?

 


Prescribed self-test - fine in case of infection - Prescribed self-test (each as a legal measure, supported by communication technology)


2. That's practically the same as the strategy in China, isn't it?


no In China, tough (but only partially effective) measures such as curfews are imposed by the government.

At KUH, on the other hand, every citizen develops their own strategy, i.e. with a complete degree of freedom in how to prevent infection. The incentive is to avoid a fine.

The entire package of measures worth billions is no longer applicable.


3. But that might be uncomfortable for the citizens, isn't it?


The concept is intended to be a better alternative to the previous approach. If this procedure works as described, it will be much more pleasant for the citizens, because there are only short phases of personal effort and the months-long measures are no longer necessary.


a) 2-3 phases per year with 10-14 days of exertion each, outside of the phases but conventional lifestyle.

b) Avoiding the annual damage of over 100,000,000,000 euros.


Above all, joint success would become visible.


4. As a creative agency, are you even allowed to put forward such an idea?


The idea aims to offer a better solution in an objective sense, with great openness to better aspects or solutions.

It is a proposal for the authorities that deal with (science) and decide (politics) such issues.


5. Is the concept legally feasible?


This question is to be discussed by lawyers and jurisprudence. Various legal questions will certainly arise, not least in the area of ​​data protection. A discussion of fundamental rights is also certainly necessary. However, the said fine would not be issued for “being ill”, but for “not preventing” the infection.

 

6. What would be a good course for KUH?


Important political authorities have been demonstrably informed since January 2022. If the political authority initiates feasibility studies immediately, at least immediately, in order to be able to use KUH as an option on a sound basis, and drives the corresponding technical development forward at the same time. It would also be great if there were a pilot project, something like an "island" with some people trying it out.


7. What is the main goal of KUH?


That our sense of community in the pandemic approach changes significantly for the better. Of course, it is primarily a legal measure, but it may result in us as a population understanding better that we ourselves are both the makers and the preventers of a pandemic. Because the virus is a motionless living being. Our actions alone cause pandemics.


8. But the pandemic will soon be over anyway?


There are several reasons why KUH could be highly important:


1. For use in the current pandemic

2. For upcoming pandemics (which may bring even higher mortality, and where a pandemic strategy like this would have catastrophic effects)

3. With regard to pandemics that could possibly be triggered by biological weapons.

 

 

Excerpts from the above brochure for the press:


Is this procedure the top solution for
Pandemic Control?


Aimed at decision-makers from politics,
to the press,
to software developers,
to investors and innovators


Thoughtful, creative approach
In this consideration, it is assumed that long-term measures are categorically the wrong way to combat a pandemic.
Symbolically, you extinguish a fire quickly and violently, and not with shot glasses over a long period of time. Today's networked "smartphone world" also offers great opportunities to make our joint fight against pandemics more successful.


The central question
Do we want the previous, years-long, highly stressful approach to a pandemic, or instead short, effective phases (of the order of 2x14 days in winter) using our discipline?


"Better to pull together hard for 14 days than 7 months of lockdown & Co.?"


A few days where everyone tests whether they were previously infected.
2 weeks, where an infection entails a high fine,
and each individual must develop a “zero contagion strategy”.
Second test(s) where positive result will result in fine.
Man is very good at short-term effort,
with long measures he naturally loses zeal and discipline.
A mandated “zero contagion strategy” reduces within days
the number of cases is drastic, so that only 2-3 such phases may be necessary per year.
This drastic-sounding measure is ultimately to the advantage of all instances: citizens, state, economy, etc., salami tactics are avoided.

 

“The description of the problem”


Important: It should be noted that this idea/invention is not directed against the current pandemic measures.

How important current measures are - and that they also have a significantly positive effect - is undisputed.
Above all, the current measures are apparently the best we have at the moment.

Unavoidable Problems: There are, however, obstacles to the current approach.

1. Since the disease does not appear threatening to many young adults, they live an “individual strategy” instead of a necessary “group strategy”. Put more simply: Someone who does not see the disease as a threat tends to live a self-centered life without being interested in the risk groups.

2. The strength of the pandemic measures is based on incidence values: As a result, the proverbial “keep the fire blazing.” When the incidence is high, quite a lot of water is poured onto the fire
(e.g.: hard lockdown), with low incidences it is relaxed. Ultimately, however, this means that measures take a very long time and the fire cannot be extinguished at all.

3. Although the citizen's participation in pandemic measures is regulated by law, it is ultimately a "Dear citizen, please join us." When danger is imminent - i.e. many people are threatening to die and hundreds of billions of euros in economic damage are incurred - the participation of citizens in pandemic measures should be more superficial.

Politicians do not prescribe short-term measures
(understandable, because the procedure is missing so far)
People are not good at long-term measures
(understandable, because man is man)

 

“Why this idea?
Because it is the procedure
what I would like to ask myself."

 

What is the improvement?
The long yellow bar shows the actual course of winter 2020/2021 so far. Measures were initiated on November 2nd and adjusted depending on the infection rate. Nevertheless, the infection rate remained at a high level. The result: Dramatically high economic damage and a severely restricted quality of life for the citizens, due to the well-known, human-stressing measures, up to a high level of sympathy for children and young people due to increasing domestic violence etc. .
The short yellow bars show the shorter measures, i.e. the purpose of the patent application:
Every citizen is tested at the beginning of the yellow short phase - or alternatively takes a documented self-test. Then every citizen has to make sure not to get infected for the approx. 2-week fine phase. At the end of the fine phase, there is again a test obligation.

Desired effect: Within these short-term measures, the number of infected people drops drastically.

The advantage: Ultimately, only 2-3 phases are necessary per cold season. All the rest of the time, the quality of life is maintained and the economy is stable and unburdened.


"Possible
fine conception”


Explanation of the phases


mindfulness

In this phase, every citizen must take responsibility for not getting infected,
because within the incubation period of 5 days there is a risk that test 1 will be negative despite infection and will later lead to an unjustified fine.

 

test 1

On these 2 days, every citizen has to take a test.
If there is not enough test capacity available, a self-documented rapid antigen test is carried out with the smartphone, with the execution being recorded by self-filming.
The high false positive rate of an antigen rapid test in Test 1 helps the citizen not to be exposed to an unjustified fine. The small false-negative rate of an antigen rapid test (0.3%) almost completely rules out unjustified fines, and optionally every citizen can carry out a second test 1 with an antigen rapid test from another manufacturer at the same time.
The joint test 1 already provides a very useful overview of existing infections.


non-contagion obligation
In this phase, every citizen must take responsibility for not getting infected,
because within the incubation period of 5 days there is a risk that test 1 will be negative despite infection and will later lead to an unjustified fine.


test 2
If test 1 is negative and test 2 positive, the respective citizen receives the fine.
If the citizen doubts Test 2, he can alternatively have a PCR test carried out.
On these 2 days, every citizen has to take a test.
If there is not enough test capacity available, a self-documented rapid antigen test is carried out with the smartphone, with the execution being recorded by self-filming.
The high false positive rate of an antigen rapid test in Test 1 helps the citizen not to be exposed to an unjustified fine. The small false-negative rate of an antigen rapid test (0.3%) almost completely rules out unjustified fines, and optionally every citizen can carry out a second test 1 with an antigen rapid test from another manufacturer at the same time.
The joint test 1 already provides a very useful overview of existing infections.

 

 

 

 

 

Disclaimer: An idea/concept by our creativity agency.

Contact: +49 (0)1520 8271780 , bz@kinooptik.de

Druckversion | Sitemap
© Bodo Zeidler